« Cyrus Cylinder is "Babylonian artifact"?? | Main | Plans for Iran nuke strategy consists of half-facts and fiction »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420523653ef0120a6230545970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Leverett's new blog on Iran:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Ray,
While I agree about the nuclear monopoly idea, there is another very serious factor at play. That is certain elements would want to avoid at all costs any reconciliation between Iran and the United States. Therefore, any happy agreement on nukes will be anathema to them.
If Iran responds positively to this deal, but insists that uranium be shipped out in stages to avoid theft, they will claim that Iran has 'rejected' this very fair offer. They will demand sanctions and Iran will simply decide to enrich the uranium to 20% on its own. This will 'prove' that Iran simply wanted the bomb all along.
That's my prediction.
Posted by: Lysander | October 28, 2009 at 04:11 PM
No matter how much the western media hype-up the "Iran's nuclear quest" story, it all boils down to this fact, the powers that be are aiming to monopolize enriched uranium.
Now that Iran has agreed to buy in the enriched uranium, it seems those countries that opposed "nuclear Iran" in the first place, are now competing against each other to sell the stuff to Iran. How ironic is that!
Posted by: Ray | October 27, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Dearest Cyrus,
It is now becoming profusely clear that your analysis on the monopolization of nuclear fuel is the correct one. Further more, I would hope to think that the IRI officials do realise that, buying enriched fuel for their use, not only puts Iran’s future economy in a precarious position, it also denies the future Iran of it’s rights to gain the technology for generations to come.
What we hear from the Israeli’s is nothing new, every intellectual person on this planet is aware of the Zionist’s intention and methodology. However, in this context, whilst Iran must be aware of their capabilities, I wouldn’t be too much worried about anything unconventional that Zionists may force to happen, both militarily and politically.
The IRI’s head of state have the best interest of the Iranian people at heart, therefore I am certain they’ll make the right choice however the international reaction may turnout to be.
Posted by: Ray | October 27, 2009 at 05:01 AM